|
|
Post by Huh? on Aug 30, 2013 15:08:20 GMT -8
Again TM:
"Like most people, he fixed the situation by changing his password."
Interesting, considering Tom told Hadrian:
"Hi Hadrian, Not Me! Delete!
I was hacked around 9:50AM this morning. Been dealing with this all day. Nasty.
I've reset my security settings and password.
Take Care - (The Real Tom)"
It takes Tom "all day" to "change his password"?
|
|
|
|
Post by partyhard on Aug 30, 2013 15:30:28 GMT -8
TM up with a post, where she claims to be a victim of the phishing involving Hood as well: "Links below that one continue the "phishing" theme, an accusation against KBOO Interim Engineer Tom Hood, claiming that he used email to "phish" members. (Tom Hood did no such thing, of course; his email was compromised by a phishing scammer, and I was one of those who received (and deleted) one of the hijacked emails. Like most people, he fixed the situation by changing his password.) The other links above confirm that the accuser does understand that Tom was a victim, not a perpetrator of phishing." How many other Inner Party members allegedly got the phishing e-mail, I wonder? TM is against defamation! "CALLING OUT THE ACCUSER I challenge the person(s) accusing Mr. Hood to either swear out a criminal complaint, or to desist from defamation. The anonymous accusation against Mr. Hood seems doubly unfair, considering that Tom has only endeavored to do his job during this struggle. He has had a great deal to do, with several live-remote broadcasts and live music broadcasts to deal with. The query above, "how many felonies are you clowns wanting conviction for?," is mendacious at best." we so called that they'd claim to be victims too. didn't think they'd wait so fucking long to do it tho. LMFAO |
|
|
|
Post by partyhard on Aug 30, 2013 15:40:10 GMT -8
Again TM: "Like most people, he fixed the situation by changing his password." Interesting, considering Tom told Hadrian: "Hi Hadrian, Not Me! Delete! I was hacked around 9:50AM this morning. Been dealing with this all day. Nasty. I've reset my security settings and password. Take Care - (The Real Tom)" It takes Tom "all day" to "change his password"? better yet remember the timeline? savekboofromsavekboo.blogspot.com/2013/08/go-phish-and-indymedia-connection.htmlwhy was it deleted so soon? why didn't hood tell everyone since now we KNOW it was sent from his account and he'd have a copy? [THANKS FOR CONFIRMING IT WASN'T A SPOOF DUMBASSES] why hasn't hood helped with the investigation? why has hood ignored enquiries? and like red said, we KNOW who's helping put together this new lolsuit. |
|
|
|
Post by partyhard on Aug 30, 2013 15:59:35 GMT -8
im wondering if someone's email to pimc triggered tm's little hissy fit.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Whew! on Aug 30, 2013 16:16:16 GMT -8
TM:
"Tom Hood did no such thing, of course; his email was compromised by a phishing scammer, and I was one of those who received (and deleted) one of the hijacked emails."
So TM received a phishing e-mail from an official KBOO account, deleted it, and then did nothing?
Did she communicate with Hood in any way about this? Did anyone else in the Inner Party?
More to the point, if Hood inadvertently sent a mass phishing e-mail to the people in his address book, why on earth didn't he send out a followup e-mail to the people in his address book warning them of the phishing e-mail, and warning them that their e-mail account had been compromised if they had clicked on the link in the phishing e-mail?
What sort of person is victimized by having his e-mail account hijacked by a phisher, and then doesn't warn his e-mail correspondents about the phishing e-mail?
|
|
|
|
Post by rogerhouston on Aug 30, 2013 17:16:12 GMT -8
this is better than the volunteer list paper caper
|
|
|
|
Post by KBooWasGoodOnce on Aug 30, 2013 17:49:07 GMT -8
Is our connection still piecing together most of the member list to call?
|
|
|
|
Post by partyhard on Aug 30, 2013 17:53:20 GMT -8
Is our connection still piecing together most of the member list to call? you mean the bruce silverman seppuku thing? don't know. but imma guessing the story of him shredding his copy is just that...a story. |
|
|
|
Post by An indy person on Aug 31, 2013 12:12:49 GMT -8
Hi there. Activist in-fighting, specifically, attacks against a "working activist(s)", regardless of whether the workerbees who keep the site from being disrupted agree or disgraee with that/those activists viewpoints, are against the editorial policy. Likewise, racism and they like, such as Jew this or that, are also against the editorial policy. Ad-hominem attacks in general, against anyone (crap like, this person's wife did this, you are hippie, you suck, ad nauseum) ALWAYS come down in any situation.
So, it wouldn't matter to the workerbees if this faction or that faction of the KBOO community were right or wrong, so far as in-fighting is concerned. Once it becomes clear that posts have moved past community criticism or support support of an activist group, like KBOO, to in-fighting, all the posts will moderated in some way. If a right-wing troll posts "KBOO sucks, you bunch of hippies!", of course that post will come down (always has and has nothing to do with Jenka, though she is much respected for her past work.) Posts that say "KBOO is great, awesome commitment to being a lefty!" would stay up. Posts that say, "Bob Smith at KBOO sucks and is a hippy.. signed, another KBOO person" would come down. Portland indymedia is a place for reporting news that you saw. There are plenty of troll spots and plenty of tools that will let KBOO factions fight it out that are not news sites. Maybe KBOOFightsItself.blogspot.com? That is well indexed by google.
Portland indymedia is a place for open and transparent first-person, local, original NEWS REPORTING and ALSO (as a secondary matter) allows the community to ADD FACTS to an article or ADD DISCUSSION relevant to an article. Moderators can only "take sides" if the individual moderator has PERSONAL FIRST-HAND knowledge whether the information posted is dis or mis-information. KBOO members can argue their sides attached to ONE article (heck, could even been featured), but the arguments need to not be personal and go to whatever FACTS and proposals are in front of people.
ok?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2013 12:56:36 GMT -8
Yeah, right. You will accept posts positive about KBOO, but as there isn't an alternative community radio station to be positive about, and you won't accept negative posts about KBOO, Indymedia is just an apologist hack for the inner circle at KBOO.
Doesn't really matter, as no one reads Indymedia, just like no one listens any more to KBOO.
But I'll continue to post as I see necessary, if only to annoy the workerbees with some sunshine.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 31, 2013 18:13:47 GMT -8
Hi there. Activist in-fighting, specifically, attacks against a "working activist(s)", regardless of whether the workerbees who keep the site from being disrupted agree or disgraee with that/those activists viewpoints, are against the editorial policy. Likewise, racism and they like, such as Jew this or that, are also against the editorial policy. Ad-hominem attacks in general, against anyone (crap like, this person's wife did this, you are hippie, you suck, ad nauseum) ALWAYS come down in any situation. So, it wouldn't matter to the workerbees if this faction or that faction of the KBOO community were right or wrong, so far as in-fighting is concerned. Once it becomes clear that posts have moved past community criticism or support support of an activist group, like KBOO, to in-fighting, all the posts will moderated in some way. If a right-wing troll posts "KBOO sucks, you bunch of hippies!", of course that post will come down (always has and has nothing to do with Jenka, though she is much respected for her past work.) Posts that say "KBOO is great, awesome commitment to being a lefty!" would stay up. Posts that say, "Bob Smith at KBOO sucks and is a hippy.. signed, another KBOO person" would come down. Portland indymedia is a place for reporting news that you saw. There are plenty of troll spots and plenty of tools that will let KBOO factions fight it out that are not news sites. Maybe KBOOFightsItself.blogspot.com? That is well indexed by google. Portland indymedia is a place for open and transparent first-person, local, original NEWS REPORTING and ALSO (as a secondary matter) allows the community to ADD FACTS to an article or ADD DISCUSSION relevant to an article. Moderators can only "take sides" if the individual moderator has PERSONAL FIRST-HAND knowledge whether the information posted is dis or mis-information. KBOO members can argue their sides attached to ONE article (heck, could even been featured), but the arguments need to not be personal and go to whatever FACTS and proposals are in front of people. ok? Ok? No. You 404'd the piece, deleting (not composting) so no one can judge for themselves on your new wire.
This is censorship and FAIL. Your post is full of inaccuracies. For instance, you state "Activist in-fighting,". This is one of many dishonest misrepresentations in your wall of text. Whether the critics are activists or not does not matter because KBOO radio is a non profit accountable to the public.I'll not waste time exploring more but instead refer readers to the original text and video so they may judge for themselves if your description is accurate: operationfreespeech.boards.net/thread/8/hello-free-speech That is transparency. That is free speech. Portland Indymedia has lost its way and is enabling a micro cult at the same time. There will be consequences. |
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 31, 2013 19:00:28 GMT -8
Complete contents of compost for Aug 2013 so far. Notice Operation Free Speech not listed:
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Aug 31, 2013 19:08:25 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by Gak! on Sept 1, 2013 9:14:30 GMT -8
Ad-hominem attacks in general, against anyone (crap like, this person's wife did this, you are hippie, you suck, ad nauseum) ALWAYS come down in any situation. Really? Indymedia always removes TM's ad-hominem and personal attacks? Care to give any examples of this? |
|
|
|
Post by Gak on Sept 1, 2013 9:18:26 GMT -8
Or is it your position that TM has never engaged in ad-hominem or personal attacks on an Indymedia post?
For example, do you consider linking to someone's irrelevant mug shot to be a ad-hominem or personal attack? No?
|
|
