|
Post by Hadrian Micciche on Sept 30, 2013 17:18:40 GMT -8
John dislikes me because I call him on his bullshit. The bullshit here is that John asked for a tit-for-tat closed session to ask for a review of the personnel file of a former staff person and soon to be board member. He asked for it in an agenda request form submitted to the board secretary mid-October. He asked for this closed session again at the October board meeting and again stated it was for the purpose of this tit-for-tat personnel file review. At no time did he say he needed or wanted a closed session in October to review the EAS issue. He had already said, in writing, that he would ask for this EAS issue closed session in November. He had already said it was too late to ask for the EAS issue closed session to happen in October. After his request for a tit-for-tat closed session personnel file review was denied in this October meeting, John proceeded to reveal information he had himself said at least twice before needed to be discussed in a closed sesssion. Long story short: He done fucked up. He continues his fuck-up by lying about why he felt it necessary to reveal this confidential information in open session. John can dislike me as much as he likes. It won't change the facts of the matter here.
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Red on Sept 30, 2013 17:25:58 GMT -8
"I think you are wrong about Glen Owen being a friend of Ani's. I don't think they could be further apart unless something has changed in the last year." Dude, don't know what planet you've been on, but Owen has been a friend of Theresa, and therefore Ani, FOR YEARS. This is not a secret....expect to people still koolaided by the micro-cult. I'll dig around in my files and get back to you. Just rattling your cage here. Be nice if you still had something archived.
|
|
|
Post by Hadrian Micciche on Sept 30, 2013 17:32:55 GMT -8
After I helped removed John Mackey from the KBOO board, he asked to connect with me on LinkedIn. The boy needs to get to his Masochists Anonymous meetings more. The email quoted here was forwarded to the admins to verify its authenticity:
-------------------------------------------------- "Hadrian, good to see you on LinkedIn" John Mackey via LinkedIn <member@linkedin.com> Jun 7 to me Hi Hadrian, I'd like to connect with you on LinkedIn. Accept View Profile John Mackey Radio/TV Broadcast Engineer Portland, Oregon Area
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Red on Sept 30, 2013 17:42:07 GMT -8
John Mackey was removed from the board for needlessly revealing proprietary information in an open meeting. In doing so, he clearly demonstrated he is not to be trusted to act prudently with confidential information. John gained this confidential information on October 14th, during an unauthorized after hours visit to the station. As John puts it, lives were at risk and he would be personally legal liable if he did nothing. So, for a full week, he did -- nothing. Apparently, the first time he told the station manager or the Board about the problem was in an Oct 21st email: "I looked at the EAS station log and I printed it out. I will present what I printed to the board - preferably in a closed session because it is confidential. Since it is too late for the upcoming board meeting I will put it on the agenda for the November meeting. This is in relation to KBOO not meeting FCC requirements for EAS monitoring/logging - which would be considered a serious violation!" John emailed the Board about the EAS issue the day before our October meeting and said, "Since it is too late for the upcoming board meeting I will put it on the agenda for the November meeting". One day John thinks he can wait until November to take up the issue with the Board, but the next day its such an urgent matter that he needs to bring it up in public session after his request for a private session is turned down? It's academic, but I'd like to know who's idea this was. Isn't it odd he just decided to snoop about after hours? What made him think to do that? Sounds like a set up where he's supposed to "find" the evidence. Shit like this is why we're so careful when we get a tip for a "less than trusted source". If they want us to see something, they're not doing it for rainbows and cookies. They have an angle. This is problematic. I know people who've been conned and, unless there's blackmail involved, it doesn't take much to get them started on exposing the SOBs. We can be harsh, but we're cautious about passing judgment before having most of the facts. It sounds like Mackey acted with very bad judgement. On the other hand feedbackpdx raves about his engineering skill. Kay, don't pretend to know one way or the other. But I do know the Kbots have a masochistic hate of anyone more competent them they are. So if it's true Mackey rocked as an engineer, it was only a matter of time before he found something they didn't want him to find. Set him up soon to get rid of him. [/my hypothesis] People who had to live through this shit of course won't have patience. Understandable. But it's good to figure out how and why these things happened to expose the con.
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Red on Sept 30, 2013 17:47:38 GMT -8
After I helped removed John Mackey from the KBOO board, he asked to connect with me on LinkedIn. The boy needs to get to his Masochists Anonymous meetings more. The email quoted here was forwarded to the admins to verify its authenticity: -------------------------------------------------- "Hadrian, good to see you on LinkedIn" John Mackey via LinkedIn <member@linkedin.com> Jun 7 to me Hi Hadrian, I'd like to connect with you on LinkedIn. Accept View Profile John Mackey Radio/TV Broadcast Engineer Portland, Oregon Area Don't know how long ago that was, or if Mackey agrees it was him, but that email's been connected to linked-in related phishing schemes completely unrelated to KBOO: community.linkedin.com/questions/2639/why-is-memberlinkedincom-sending-spam.htmlFYI
|
|
|
Post by Comrade Red on Sept 30, 2013 17:55:03 GMT -8
It's possible everyone's "email" is member@linkedin.com if they're using linkedin for email.
|
|
|
Post by Hadrian Micciche on Sept 30, 2013 17:56:58 GMT -8
Verification that John wanted a tit-for-tat closed session in October to review a prospective board members personnel file. He requested this closed session, for this purpose, again at the October meeting, was denied, then made public EAS information he had already said, at least twice before, needed to be discussed in a closed session. The email quoted here was forwarded to the admins to verify its authenticity:
------------------------------------------------ John Mackey <john AT parg.org> 10/12/12 to Marc, me, MichaelP, Paula, Damon, Lyn, Jeff, Lisa, S.W.
Last month the Board President led the KBOO Board into a closed session to review the personnel file of an incoming board member. (Conch reviewed my personnel file with the board in a closed session last month).
Since the precedent has been set, I assume that we (as a board) will review the personnel file of any former employee before we appoint them to the board.
----------------- The above in response to: On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Marc Brown <marcdavidbrown AT gmail.com> wrote: All,
The NomComm met last night and is recommending the following individuals to fill the two vacant seats:
Rabia Yeaman to fill Keller's seat (1-year appointment) Matthew Bristow to fill Alicia's seat (2-year appointment)
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 30, 2013 18:07:07 GMT -8
Definitely a lot of information to process.
|
|
|
Post by Hadrian Micciche on Sept 30, 2013 18:07:10 GMT -8
Verification that John intended to request a closed session about the EAS issue in November, not October. Edited for brevity. The email quoted here was forwarded to the admins to verify its authenticity:
---------------------------- John Mackey <john AT parg.org> 10/21/12 to Lynn, conchdotcom, Damon, Jeff, me, Paula, Lisa, Lyn, MichaelP, Marc
Dear Ms. Fitch, <RANT> <MORE RANTING> I looked at the EAS station log and I printed it out. I will present what I printed to the board - preferably in a closed session because it is confidential. Since it is to late for the upcoming board meeting I will put it on the agenda for the November meeting.
|
|
|
Post by lima bean on Sept 30, 2013 18:11:38 GMT -8
Old question, but reminded of it here. Why did Matthew get the 2 year term while Rabia got the one year term? Based on vote totals, Rabia should have gotten 2 years Alejandro was ineligible due to citizenship issues, but even David Haseltine got a lot more votes than Matthew. And now Matthew sits on the executive committee helping run things into the ground. Interesting...
The NomComm met last night and is recommending the following individuals to fill the two vacant seats:
Rabia Yeaman to fill Keller's seat (1-year appointment) Matthew Bristow to fill Alicia's seat (2-year appointment)
John Mackey 304 Jeff Kipilman 301 Damon Isiah Turner 256 Michael Papadopoulos 240 Rabia Yeaman 231 Alejandro Ceballos 224 David Haseltine 205 Matthew Bristow 159
|
|
|
Post by Hadrian Micciche on Sept 30, 2013 18:14:22 GMT -8
Definitely a lot of information to process. Lots of lies to dispel. Mr. Mackey might want to change his bullshit story to conform to these documented facts, presented in his own words.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 30, 2013 18:19:41 GMT -8
Verification that John intended to request a closed session about the EAS issue in November, not October. Edited for brevity. The email quoted here was forwarded to the admins to verify its authenticity: ---------------------------- John Mackey <john AT parg.org> 10/21/12 to Lynn, conchdotcom, Damon, Jeff, me, Paula, Lisa, Lyn, MichaelP, Marc Dear Ms. Fitch, <RANT> <MORE RANTING> I looked at the EAS station log and I printed it out. I will present what I printed to the board - preferably in a closed session because it is confidential. Since it is to late for the upcoming board meeting I will put it on the agenda for the November meeting. Reading the copy we received in context is disturbing. The email he's replying to is professional and reasonable. We're bothered by the reasoning for the actions....which is "kbot" reasoning: "we've always done this before, what's your problem?" Then there's Fitch who clearly has no clue she's being set up. It looks like she's being tested: will she know which "rules" to enforce, and which ones to "wink" ignore? Fitch is a professional and so of course she failed. It doesn't mean the situation wasn't used to set up Mackey too. But this doesn't look good:
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 30, 2013 18:45:59 GMT -8
Just finished breaking some email addresses to discourage bots and spiders. We know addresses, already public, where published on the blog all the time. But proboards is stricter and Mackey is a registered member.
Please try to remember to edit emails for spambots before posting.
Edit: it's possible we haven't been consistent about emails on the forum, but this is the first time a registered user is involved in a conflict with another user.
|
|
|
Post by Hadrian Micciche on Sept 30, 2013 19:17:25 GMT -8
Edit: it's possible we haven't been consistent about emails on the forum, but this is the first time a registered user is involved in a conflict with another user. John is not in conflict with me. He is in conflict with his own words.As you noted -- and quoted, -- John claims here that he asked for a closed session about the EAS issue in October. As you noted -- and quoted, -- John's email prior to that meeting says that he will ask for a closed session in November. Why John feels the need to humiliate himself in public like this is for someone else to explain.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Sept 30, 2013 21:52:27 GMT -8
Edit: it's possible we haven't been consistent about emails on the forum, but this is the first time a registered user is involved in a conflict with another user. John is not in conflict with me. He is in conflict with his own words.Perhaps a bad choice of words while wearing the Administrator hat. But if it becomes a proboards issue, it will be perceived as a user to user conflict.
|
|